Person-First vs. Identity-First Language

| CHALLENGE | DAY 1 | DAY 2 | DAY 3 | DAY 4 | DAY 5 | DAY 6 | DAY 7 | DAY 8 | DAY 9 | DAY 10 |

Language is a powerful tool that shapes our perception of the world and the people in it. When discussing disabilities, the choice of language can significantly impact how individuals with disabilities are viewed and treated. Two prominent approaches to disability language are person-first language and identity-first language. Below, we’ll explore the nuances of these two approaches, their significance, and how they can empower individuals with disabilities.

Person-First Language

Person-first language is an approach that emphasizes putting the person before the disability. This approach helps counteract negative stereotypes and biases by focusing on the person’s abilities and potential rather than their limitations. The idea behind person-first language is to highlight the individual’s humanity, acknowledging that their disability is just one aspect of who they are, and to avoid reducing them to a single characteristic or label. Person-first language is often seen as a more inclusive and respectful way to address individuals with disabilities, fostering a sense of belonging.

For example, instead of saying “disabled person,” you would say “person with a disability.”

What this approach can accomplish:

• Promote respect and dignity
• Reduce stigma
• Increase inclusivity

Identity-First Language

On the other hand, identity-first language, also known as disability-first language, emphasizes the disability as an integral part of an individual’s identity.  Identity-first language can empower individuals by acknowledging their disability as a core part of their identity, something they may embrace and take pride in. This approach recognizes that the disability is not something separate from the person but an essential aspect of who they are. By openly acknowledging their disability, individuals using identity-first language often engage more readily in advocacy and disability awareness efforts. It fosters a sense of community and solidarity among individuals with similar disabilities, reinforcing shared experiences and challenges.

For example, instead of saying “person with autism,” you would say “autistic person.”

What this approach can create:

• Empowerment
• Solidarity
• Advocacy

Navigating the Balance

While the choice between person-first and identity-first language may seem straightforward, it’s essential to recognize that there is no one-size-fits-all approach. Individuals with disabilities have diverse perspectives and preferences when it comes to language. Some may prefer person-first language, while others may feel a stronger connection to identity-first language. Both person-first and identity-first language have their merits, and their appropriateness can vary from person to person.

What’s most important is that our language and attitudes reflect respect, dignity, and empowerment for individuals with disabilities. It’s crucial to respect and honor an individual’s choice of language. Ask them how they prefer to be addressed and use the terminology that they are most comfortable with. This approach respects their agency and allows them to define their own identity. By recognizing and validating their choices regarding language, we can contribute to a more inclusive and understanding society where everyone’s voice is heard and valued.

Ultimately, the power of language lies in its ability to shape perceptions and attitudes, making it our collective responsibility to use it wisely and compassionately.

| CHALLENGE | DAY 1 | DAY 2 | DAY 3 | DAY 4 | DAY 5 | DAY 6 | DAY 7 | DAY 8 | DAY 9 | DAY 10 |